|
Scott, I've wondered about this ever since IBM introduced the CHGPF command. It does allow for an alternative strategy. And with shared indexes doesn't take up much disk space. I'm willing to bet that the 80/20 rule applies to most applications (80% of the programs only need 20% of the data) Thanks. Scott Mildenberger wrote: > > James, > > If all your programs access the data through the logicals explicitly listing > the fields then you can change the physical and programs using the logicals > will still work even with LVLCHK(*YES). This method (all data access > through logicals with explicitly named fields) is a good method to make it > much easier to change database files. You just create a new version of the > logicals and only change the programs that need to access the new field(s). > I am currently working on a new project and this is how all data access is > being done.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.