|
Do you have the luxury of having SQL on you system so you can build dynamic sqls right in your RPG inquiry programs? Otherwise there is the old opnqryf dynamic builds - as for overhead, I have never gone that far, but, I do have a logical built over 5 rather large physical files - we get bit HARD if we do a re-org on any of those files (by large I mean each file has well over 10 million records - to some that would be average) And these physicals each have 10 logicals over them - the hits seem fine, but we took a lot of page fault hits until we added memory and adjusted our pools. HTH Mark -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com [mailto:rpg400-l-admin@midrange.com]On Behalf Of Tom Daly Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 10:32 AM To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com' Subject: PF with lotsa LFs Anyone ever have a file with 100+ logicals? The design choice I'm facing is either fewer LFs but more complicated inquiry programs & potential performance penalties vs. having many logicals with simpler and quicker programs (less file reads). Any wisdom on this? Pitfalls? Considerations? Thanks... Tom _______________________________________________ This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options, visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.