|
Hi Scott - >Use *NEW & *CALLER. When used correctly (which is easy to to) they yield >the same performance as named groups. They're more efficient on memory. >They don't leave overrides laying around that can randomly affect other >jobs. They don't create the maintenance nightmare of named groups. >They're easier to use, and a better solution. Right on! I've been using true ILE for a couple of years now with a bunch of service programs and stuff. I've yet to see a need for anything besides *NEW and *CALLER. The one statement you made that I would take exception to is: >They don't leave overrides laying around that can randomly affect other >jobs. Overrides inside of a named activation group aren't going to affect any other activation group, much less another job. Ken http://www.ke9nr.org/ Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views of my employer or anyone in their right mind.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.