|
>As a person relatively new to using ILE and >activation groups, I can say Buck's suggestion >to use the 'QILE' named activation group works >in our shop. On our system we have very few >file overrides, so the scoping behavior >does not bother us. I'd only like to add that this isn't a contest where my opinion 'wins' and others 'lose.' _Every_ person who has gently remarked that *NEW/*CALLER should be addressed is RIGHT! I just picked a place to start. Some organisations will find a simple "put it all in AG('QILE')" to work. What I aim to do is to see that a beginner can understand why that choice is, or is not valid for her situation. It's all about trade-offs. --buck
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.