|
midrange.com
A few nice things about CL ...
1. CL is much better than HLL's when is comes to recovering from errors (via
retry for CPF messages), so wrapping processes in CL wrappers, especially
batch processes, is a good thing.
2. It takes much less time to code a command in CL than to code the related
API in a HLL.
3. Prompting CL commands is not so easy to do when coding a HLL from SEU.
Three cheers for CL !!! -Dave K
----- Original Message ----- >
> >With QCMDEXC, the C system function, etc. etc. not to mention the new
> >MONITOR support I can't see that I need CL much at all - which since I
> >dislike CL makes me a happy guy.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
