|
Just to keep the list up-to-date with my progress on resolving my problem: After visiting with our BP, I ordered and installed PTFs SF99105, SF99096, and SF99450. These had no affect, my files are still left open after the /SQL close has been executed. Finally, I've resorted to breaking my monolithic program down into several single-function sub-programs. Basically, I've moved each sub-procedure intact into a separate program (each sets on *INLR), built a data structure which I pass around as a parm (each sub-program fills in its own part of the DS), and changed the monolith to be a driver program. They still do _exactly_ what they did before as sub-procedure in the monolith. My files are now being CLOSED and RELEASED - just like I want. I was really hoping to be able to migrate the sub-procedures into a server module, but my guess is that if I were to do so my experience would be the same as in leaving them in the monolith. Hans, Barbara, et al IBMers lurking - have you been able to follow this thread? Is this normal behavior for imbedded SQL?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.