Re: LVLCHK(*NO)

[EThompson@xxxxxxxx]

Well I do not know why it would be bad necessarily, but if you are doing
CPYF, i would use a *MAP *DROP

Elonna Thompson
CHCS Services, Inc.
Information Technologies
850-432-1700  x2204



                      J Michael Smith
                      <JMichael.Smith@a        To:       "RPG400-L (E-mail)" 
<RPG400-L@midrange.com>, "RPGIV (E-mail)"
                      rch.com>                  <RPGIV@yahoogroups.com>
                      Sent by:                 cc:
                      rpg400-l-admin@mi        Subject:  LVLCHK(*NO)
                      drange.com


                      08/22/02 03:21 PM
                      Please respond to
                      rpg400-l






After reviewing the archives, I find that most would not recommend using
LVLCHK(*NO).

With that as a given, we are considering adding two alpha(3 position
fields)
to a master file.  There are no changes of any kind to the previous
"fields"
and the new fields will be added a the end of the DDS.

Can someone tell me why using LVLCHK(*NO) would the a bad thing to do in
this situation.

Michael Smith
_______________________________________________
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@midrange.com
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@midrange.com
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.