RE: Difference B/W Return and seton LR from a programme to a parent programme

["David Rittenberg" <DRittenberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Does this mean the child program needs to run in activation group *CALLER?
-------Original Message-------
From: Scott Mildenberger <Smildenber@Washcorp.com>
To: "'rpg400-l@midrange.com'" <rpg400-l@midrange.com>
Subject: RE: Difference B/W Return and seton LR from a programme to a pare
             nt p rogramme
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 14:16:26 -0600
Reply-To: rpg400-l@midrange.com

Are these RPG IV?  If so, what activation group is the parent and child
programs running in?  A program that has *NEW for the activation group will
act like LR was set on when it exits.

Scott Mildenberger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jain, Anshul (IndSys,) [mailto:Anshul.Jain@indsys.ge.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 2:17 PM
> To: 'rpg400-l@midrange.com'
> Subject: Difference B/W Return and seton LR from a programme
> to a parent
> p rogramme
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I understand that while we return from a child programme to a parent
> programme, variables state(i.e. value), file pointers etc.
> are preserved for
> subsequent call in a job. While seton LR initializes everything.
>
> Now it is not working for our application. Is there something
> related to OS
> upgrade because we had upgrade from V4R5 to V5R1 in the very
> recent past ?