rob=tksaTn4SAz0AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
> I went into Code/400 and had it automatically generate me a PSDS.  I don't
> any field here which may be useful.  While the PSDS may be useful, it is
> rather inflexible to change with the time.  For example what do you
> suppose the following contains in a program made up of multiple source
> modules?  The module containing the procedure you happen to be in when you
> check these fields?
>      D P_SRC_FILE            304    313      * Source file
>      D P_SRC_LIB             314    323      * Source file lib
>      D P_SRC_MBR             324    333      * Source file mbr
>      D P_PROC_PGM            334    343      * Pgm Proc is in
>      D P_PROC_MOD            344    353      * Mod Proc is in
>

Rob, each module has its own PSDS, so indeed those fields reflect the
values for the current module.  I never figured out why those particular
fields were useful for programs, but assuming they were, why would they
be less useful for modules?




This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.