Yes.

mlazarus@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Hans,

Is the TABxxxxx prefix still a requirement when specifying tables?

-mark

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Hans Boldt boldt@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 08:44:32 -0400
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: %TLOOKUP


Dave: That message is issued for several reasons. Clearly, the 2nd parameter is a table, and so that can't be the reason. Check the definition of the search argument ARPA. The types of the first two arguments must be compatible. That is, ARPA must be of type character.


Cheers! Hans




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.