|
>> There is absolutely no good reason, and no defensible rationale, for a BIF put into free-form to not be included in RPG IV. Sorry Joe - but I have to disagree on this one. All of the new BIFs that can fit (e.g. %Date, %Diff, etc.) plus qualified names and a bunch more are indeed supported in the semi-free (i.e. EVAL/CALLP). The only ones that are not supported are ones for which there is a perfectly good reason not to support them other than in /Free - the darned things don't fir and/or have no place to put the required new parameter (read factor). Many of the new BIFs in V5R2 related to IO operations don't "fit" in fixed form. Take %Fields for example - where exactly do you put it? I think they did a good job of enabling the bulk of the new function in the old format. /Free has allowed them to expand the boundaries of the language. Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.