|
Qouting myself.... > How do i interpret this ? Is VALUE related to this > optimization ? Wouldn't > be another way to call procedures with parameters defined as > CONST or passed > by reference ? I've already tried prototyping the three params as (*), setting 2 in the parameters format array (to specify pointer, becouse that's what a procedure expects in this case). The api is caller and no error is returned, but the value recieved is incorrect (garbage). Carlos K.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
