|
midrange.com
> From: Hans Boldt
>
> That's not a bad idea. If we ever get free-form F, D, I, O, and P
> specs, it's not unreasonable to expect an option to assume /FREE and
> /END-FREE around the code.
>
Hans,
I'm probably missing something obvious, but why can't this be done even
with the existing fixed specs? If the control spec (ie:
sourcetype(*FREE) ) is set to free, then the compiler should assume that
all eligible source statements (currently only C specs) are coded in
free form.
Alternatively, we could specify the relevent spec-types as a parameter
to the keyword:
FREE('C')
FREE('CFD')
FREE(*ALL)
John Taylor
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
