RE: Free form code suggestion

["John Taylor" <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Mike Haston

> If you need /free and /end-free tags "all over the place" 
> then you couldn't use this all source alternative anyway, 
> could you?  But if your code does fall into this criteria, 
> then you'd just have to use one /free and one /end and that 
> doesn't seem like too much coding.  Or am I missing something?

In addition to the mainline, there is a pair of tags required within
each sub-procedure. In my opinion, the tags clutter up the code
needlessly, since I don't write mixed-form source members.

It's not something that I would expect IBM to spend a lot of time on,
but it *seems* easy enough to eliminate the need for them, so I figured
why not throw it out there. The worst that can happen is that, well,
nothing happens.


John Taylor