|
> Here are the links that I am looking at, and I was just commenting on the > fact that there are many(definition up to you) C specifications in the > documents. If they are truly trying to sway programmers to newer stuff, why > continue to use the old stuff? My opinion is that should provide examples in both syntaxes. These books are intended to be the ultimate reference on the language, as such they should provide documentations and examples of everything you can do with the language, not just the newest thing.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
