Re: Replacing subroutines with subprocedures

[Scott Klement <klemscot@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Tim,

Quite frankly, I think a SELECT group is a better way to do it than
calling the subprocedure by name.

However, I just did an article on this in the Club Tech iSeries
Programming Tips newsletter over at iSeriesNetwork.com.  That demonstrates
both ways of calling variable-named subprocedures.

Here's a link:
http://www.iseriesnetwork.com/resources/clubtech/index.cfm?fuseaction=ShowNewsletterItem&ID=17586&PubID=8&IssueDate=November%206%2C%202003

(Hmmm... it still names Chuck Lundgren as the author, I'm going to have to
get that fixed)

If you can't get the info from that site, let me know, I'll just e-mail it
to you.


On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Tim Kredlo wrote:
>
> Since these subroutines are also included in other 'mid' type
> programs, I am hoping to replace them with external subprocedures
> (call them 'BotPgm's).
>
> I was hoping for a way to reduce coding lines and make this
> procedure more 'reusable', if not generic, with something
> along the following lines.
>