> From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> And what would restrict the public from being able to call the I/O
module?
>  Security-by-obscurity?

OS/400 object authority.  And since it's only a programmatic interface
not designed to be called from a command line, even if a user gets
access to a command line they can't just invoke the I/O module.

Now, an unscrupulous programmer could indeed write an interface to the
I/O module and then grant authority to a production user who could then
use it to update data.  If that's your concern, then you need one more
level of security, wherein the trigger program checks for a valid caller
to the I/O module.  You also need probably need a better screening
process for your developers <grin>.

Of course, if you have unscrupulous programmers with access to
production data, then you have much larger security problems.  This is,
however, a good reason to not allow programmers authority to production
data <smile>.

Anyway, this is pretty basic stuff.  I think if you sat down and worked
through the issues yourself you'd see how a combination of adopted
authority and proper security can completely lock down your data under
most normal circumstances.

Joe


This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.