|
> From: Wilbert van der Hoeven > > I would never set On to *Off. But I can't guarentee that the other 5 > programmers that changed the program after I wrote it will not have > changed the program and set On to *Off somewhere. Wilbert, I'm not going to argue this point. If you work in a shop where someone changes someone else's programs in this way, then you have serious problems. This is not a valid argument in any shop I work in. > I think that the DO statement is not the right place to leave the loop. > The right place for me to leave the loop is the place where you meet a > condition to leave that loop. No chance of making mistakes. That's your opinion, which I disagree with. In fact, most of the time I disagree with any sort of statement that says one syntactical construct is "better" than another; there are always reasons to use different techniques and in the end, it's all still Branch-On-Condition. But since we're discussing opinions and you're proposing an absolute, we should probably just leave it at that. Joe
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.