|
>>>In general though, iterating for *HIVAL number of times takes a >>>long long time. (Decimal *HIVAL on V5R2 is 10**31-1.) And if *HIVAL >>>iterations seems to take an eternity on a V5R2 machine, it will >>>seem even longer on V5R3! ;-) >> >> >> That could mean that we get numeric variables capable of holding more >> digits or that V5R3 is slower - may we assume the first? :-) >> > I think that's a safe assumption. Not that anyone /really/ needs more > than 31 digits of precision, eh? ;-) Maybe it's a good argument for my next salary talk! (Look, so many unused digits! :-) Will it be 63 digits? Or even more? 127? Which one will be affected? Longer integers, too? Binary? More significant digits for floats? (Not that i ever needed them :-) If you can't tell us all these secrets, when and where will it be official? Thanks, have another one! Cheers! -- Mit freundlichen Grüssen / best regards Anton Gombkötö Organisation und Projektleitung Avenum Technologie GmbH Wien - Salzburg - Stuttgart http://www.avenum.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.