>>>In general though, iterating for *HIVAL number of times takes a
>>>long long time. (Decimal *HIVAL on V5R2 is 10**31-1.) And if *HIVAL
>>>iterations seems to take an eternity on a V5R2 machine, it will
>>>seem even longer on V5R3! ;-)
>> 
>> 
>> That could mean that we get numeric variables capable of holding more
>> digits or that V5R3 is slower - may we assume the first? :-)
>> 

> I think that's a safe assumption. Not that anyone /really/ needs more
> than 31 digits of precision, eh? ;-)

Maybe it's a good argument for my next salary talk! (Look, so many
unused digits! :-)

Will it be 63 digits? Or even more? 127? Which one will be affected?
Longer integers, too? Binary? More significant digits for floats? (Not
that i ever needed them :-)

If you can't tell us all these secrets, when and where will it be
official?

Thanks, have another one! Cheers!

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüssen / best regards

Anton Gombkötö
Organisation und Projektleitung

Avenum Technologie GmbH
Wien - Salzburg - Stuttgart
http://www.avenum.com




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.