subject: RE: Subroutines vs Subprocedures was RE: Indicators -- RPG400-L

Subject: subject: RE: Subroutines vs Subprocedures was RE: Indicators
From: EDoxtator <doc6502@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 16:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

>from: "Lim Hock-Chai" <Lim.Hock-Chai@xxxxxxxx>
>subject: RE: Subroutines vs Subprocedures was RE: Indicators

>So far I think Scott is the only one that agrees with me about no reason to
use 
>sub-routine.

Nope.  I really really hate subroutines.  Makes me feel like I'm programming in
AppleSoft, circa 1982.

-Doc

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.