|
I think it might have something to do with the change management package. Sometime change management package compile/create object in its own library first before moving it to production. This step is causing the dup proc to happen. -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Christen, Duane J. Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 9:13 AM To: 'RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries' Subject: Re-creating Service Programs and Binding Directories I have searched the archive and infocenter and have not come up with a good answer. Our set-up of Turnover does not allow the use of UPDSRVPGM. I am re-creating a service program (CRTSRVPGM), which alredy exists in the binding directory. The binder is finding the exports for the existing functions in both the modules listed on the CRTSRVPGM command and in the existing service program (found in the binding directory), which results in "multiple strong definitions". I know I can get around this by using DUPPROC and/or DUPVAR (which I have done previously), but this does not seem "correct" to me. Why would the binder examine the service program that is going to be replaced for exports which will not exist? My hope is that we are missing a PTF, my fear is that this is the nature of the beast. Duane Christen
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.