|
Tom, > But I've been disturbed by lack of advancement in CL in general... > And I'd like to see a number of other things that others have > mentioned/requested over the years. Me too! While I love the command definition concept (and have often wondered why more people don't take advantage of it), it *could* be so much better. > I've understood why IBM resists advancing CL in such ways, but that doesn't > reduce frustration. You've got one up on me. I don't understand it. There are some things which, from the outside looking in anyway, would seemingly be both simple to implement and have no backward compatibility issues. But I've pretty much given up on the idea we'll ever see enhancements made. Though I once said that about some of the stuff recently added to CL too. So I'd love to be proved wrong... Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.