RE: No Subroutines (was Re: Debugging many subprocedures) -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: No Subroutines (was Re: Debugging many subprocedures)
From: Scott Klement <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:39:57 -0500 (CDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

And procedures can be misused most horribly.  One of the worst offenses
I see is procedure with a bunch of return opcodes strewn throughout it.
At least with a subroutine you can stick a breakpoint on the ENDSR and
know it will get there.


Unless there's a LEAVESR.  Or a GOTO.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: No Subroutines (was Re: Debugging many subprocedures) , Paul Morgan
RE: No Subroutines (was Re: Debugging many subprocedures) , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.