>>What performance considerations with Const?

Look at the following article by Scott Klement
(Free registration is required)
Why Combine CONST, VARYING, and OPTIONS(*VARSIZE)?
http://www.iseriesnetwork.com/artarchive/index.cfm?fuseaction=viewNewsletter
Article&webID=1001&newsID=5012&issueID=5325&articleID=51273

Birgitta


-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]Im Auftrag von Kurt Anderson
Gesendet: Freitag, 29. Juli 2005 22:54
An: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Betreff: RE: No Subroutines (was Re: Debugging many subprocedures)


> The reason I say other than the prototype is because there are
performance
> considerations when using VALUE and CONST.

(Trying to catch up on all the procedure-related emails...)

What performance considerations with Const?

Thanks,

Kurt Anderson
Application Developer
Highsmith Inc

--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.