Re: Embedded SQL question

[Geeky400 <Geeky400@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

   "I am still learning"
   Michelangelo - 1475-1564

   G4!

   Michael Jacobsen wrote:

 For the record, I agree with you guys and I took out the F spec.  I was
 only pointing out that I could see it possibly causing a problem, based on
 my own ignorance.  I didn't know it was possible to update a file without
 coding the filename on the F-Spec, SQL or not.  And I imagine I'm not the
 only one who didn't know that.

 Mike


 rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 09/19/2005 11:16:25 AM:

  

 Coding the F spec just so that someone can see that a file is updated
 sounds more confusing.  I would think that the /EXEC SQL would give them
    

  

 enough pause to think what happens.  Especially when they start to
 understand SQL and wonder why you left in the F spec.

 And I do realize what you are trying to accomplish.  I converted all my
 *ENTRY PLIST's to Procedure Interfaces as recommended by the Sorcerer's
 Guide, yet for those who still scan for *entry I still put in
      D MYPGM           PI                        *ENTRY PLIST
 Which probably won't come in good to the list since of wrapping, but
 basically the *ENTRY PLIST is off in the comment section.

 Rob Berendt
    

   ___________________________________________________________ How much free
   photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo!
   Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com