Re: Chaining with multiple key fields

[Peter.Colpaert@xxxxxxxxxx]

Pete,

I seem to remember that chaining with on-the-fly keylists caused a problem 
if the first key field was numeric or packed.

There should be a PTF to cure that...

HTH,

Peter Colpaert
Application Developer
Massive - Kontich, Belgium
-----
Yoda of Borg are we.  Futile is resistance, assimilated will you be.
-----




Pete Helgren <Pete@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
21/10/2005 05:20
Please respond to RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries

 
        To:     RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: Chaining with multiple key fields


Here is the whole tamale:
 
    C/Free
         IF  #$FY  >  50;
              FYKEY = 1900 + #$FY;
          ELSE;
              FYKEY = 2000 + #$FY;
        ENDIF;

      CHAIN FYKEY FPCS101;
 
      IF  %FOUND;

         Count# = 1;

         dow Count# <= 5;

         if COCrt(count#) <> *blanks;
 
           if COPOSN = Count#;
              Chain Crt(count#) PPCS120;
              If %found;
                Sht(count#) = PDSHRT;
                lng(count#) = PDDESC;
              ENDIF;
           else;
            Chain (count# : Crt(count#))  PPCS105;
              If %found;
                sht(count#) = CCSHRT;
                lng(count#) = CCDESC;
              ENDIF;
           ENDIF;
         Endif;
         Count# = Count# + 1;
         ENDDO;
       ENDIF;
  /End-Free

I don't see anywhere that I missed a closing ";" or paren or whatever 
but these eyes have just about had it today.....

Pete

Scott Klement wrote:

>>  284                    Chain (count# : Crt(count#))  PPCS105; 
>> ======>                         a       b ccc *RNF5309 30 a 
>> 002626  Factor 1 operand is not valid. *RNF5031 20 b      002626 
>> Result-Field operand is not valid. *RNF5507 30 c      002626  A 
>> semi-colon is not specified at the end of a free-
>>                          specification.
>
>
> What does the statement BEFORE this one look like.  Does it have a 
> semi-colon at the end?