|
Ron, Who needs all these sophisticated networks when you have MRT's? Weren't they > fun? > > Contrary to some opinions.those were NOT the good 'ol days. Actually, I didn't think MRT-NEPs were much more work than a SRT when you approached it correctly. This included the use of the cycle and calling the Workstn file a Primary file. And it was pretty amazing to think of what kind of performance we could get out of a box with 64KB (not MB) of memory for SSP plus all user programs when we used MRT-NEPs to share the memory but still have multiple users active. Doug (But I'll quit now as this belongs in another list...)
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.