Re: Workaround for 32767-byte and 32767-element limits?

["James H H Lampert" <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Perhaps a little searching on "dynamic arrays" would get 
> you there.  I think it involves use of the alloc op code.
>  Might be an example in the Sorcerer's Redbook.
If we're talking about SG24-5402-00, an initial search on 
the word "pointer" finds a lot of references to procedure 
pointers, but not so many to data pointers (and most of 
that in connection with things I'm already accustomed to, 
involving RPG calling C, rather than the other way 
around). But that was only a quick look before lunch; I'll 
be continuing shortly.
Alloc op code? But as I said, the space is already 
allocated in the calling module.
--
JHHL