RE: Using RRN 0 to do Setll on arrival sequence file

["Lim Hock-Chai" <Lim.Hock-Chai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I would have to disagree with that theory.  Simply because it goes
against what setll suppose to do.  If a file has a 3 chars long key
field and the file contains records below:
AAA
BBB
CCC

If I do setll with *blank, I would expect it to go to BOF even though
blank record does not exist in the file.

Interesting to know that setgt 0 actually work.  That kind of blow away
Alan's theory that RRN 0 is not a relative record number and it doesn't
know who to position the cursor.



-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces+lim.hock-chai=usamobility.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces+lim.hock-chai=usamobility.com@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Kurt Anderson
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 2:34 PM
To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries
Subject: RE: Using RRN 0 to do Setll on arrival sequence file

I said:

> In a file where the first RRN is 2, SetLL 1 positions to the deleted
RRN
> 1 record, not to EOF.  (I'm guessing it positions to the deleted
record, though I know it doesn't position to EoF.)

What I was getting at is you can SetLL to any relative record number
from 1 to highest RRN in file and not position to EoF, regardless of
whether or not any of those records have previously been deleted.  That
concept is a guess, but seems to be how it works.  Once you exit that
range of RRNs, you will not find a record and position to End of File.

Kurt Anderson
Application Developer
Highsmith Inc


--
This is the RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries (RPG400-L) mailing
list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.