|
And in this particular app I actually have an array and a MODS. I load
the array because I then sort the data before loading it into the MODS. Why not use qsort to sort the MODS directly? Or alternatively use a pointer to base the MODS on the storage used by the array? That approach would help both in terms of the memory footprint and speed since there's no need to copy the data. But why is an ORDER BY not being used in the SQL to avoid the need for sorting - or am I missing something? Jon Paris Partner400 www.Partner400.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
