|
I've to disagree and say that Rob's suggestion is likely to be the best. Using CC is likely to make the process to run faster and will not leave those deleted records in the file. -----Original Message----- From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Walden H. Leverich Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 10:51 AM To: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries Subject: RE: Native Delete vs. SQL As for Rob's question about commitment control... CC would be nice here, but I don't think it's really needed. There is a simple, clean way to remove unwanted rows, and I assume you don't need to hold the locks, so it may make more sense to do it w/out CC and just delete the bad rows. -Walden
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.