Re: SQL Mass Delete Vs. READ/DELETE

["Douglas Handy" <dhandy@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mike,

A similar problem does exist on our "old" files (pre-v5r4). If I use DBU RDR
> on them, it appears they are all default (regardless of deletion method).


This was a file created on an earlier box, so perhaps some more tests would
satisfy some curiosity.  But it wasn't a big deal -- which is in part which
this file isn't journaled to begin with.  I was just going to look at the
undeleted contents and was surprised when I couldn't.  This box didn't even
have UNDEL2 on it yet.

Maybe the SQL DELETE was a red herring and not related.  But when I didn't
get UNDEL2 to "work" after installing it and looking at the file, I pulled
up a few other files (also restored from a previous box) and could see the
contents in them.  I jumped to the conclusion it was the SQL DELETE, but it
may not have been.

Doug