RE: Difference between CHAINing a file name & CHAINing a record name -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: Difference between CHAINing a file name & CHAINing a record name
From: "Glenn Gundermann" <ggundermann@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:08:49 -0400 (EDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Doh! Of course it does. How stupid of me.
I hope nobody else is reading these messages ;-)

Not necessarily...

%found() only takes the file's name

Looks like inprxxl0 is the file name, and the record format name is
inprxx5.

So Ewart's code is fine.

Charles

Follow-Ups:

Re: Difference between CHAINing a file name & CHAINing a record name , Captain Jerry

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.