RE: Check constraints was: Imbedded SQL vs Sequence object -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: Check constraints was: Imbedded SQL vs Sequence object
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:59:31 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Joe, you assume that I am arguing with you on these points. I am not - I
am agreeing with you. You snipped out my stuff and looked at it
separately instead of how it related to the above statement. I do NOT
feel that "application only access" (implemented primarily via adopted
programs) is security by obscurity and never said such. The security by
obscurity is the earlier argument that I made about not naming fields SSN
and that sort of rot.
What part of "true" without any "but" do you not understand? :-)

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Check constraints was: Imbedded SQL vs Sequence object , Joe Pluta

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.