Re: Embedded SQL - Dumb Question probably

[qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

Shannon ODonnell wrote:
>    8. RE: Embedded SQL - Dumb Question probably (Shannon ODonnell)
>
> There's a thought. Is that required for embedded SQL?

Shannon:

I get digests of the RPG list, so you might have gotten a hundred other 
responses by the time this hits the list -- they haven't reached me yet. 
Still, it's late in the work day, so I might as well add my $.02 into 
the pot.

In a very practical sense, the SQL _Development_ Kit is little more than 
the pre-processor for embedded SQL. That's what allows... ummm... 
"development" of SQL applications.

True, there's more to it than that. However, processing the embedded SQL 
to enable compiling the programs is the biggest bang-for-the-buck out of 
it for most of us.

In short, Yep.

Tom Liotta

> -----Original Message-----
>
> The SQL Development Kit, or whatever it's called, not installed?