RE: Subprocedure invocation

["Joe Pluta" <joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> From: Walden H. Leverich
>
> There's _always_ a getter and/or setter if you're accessing a property.
> But I'll grant, you can't tell if you're going after a property or a
> member variable. Of course, in good OO design, why would you go after a
> member variable?

Ah yes, opinion.  <grin>  Try telling the folks in the SWT development team
about accessing member variables.

> I think it's a style thing so. I can't stand the explicit get/set calls
> in Java. :)

I agree it really is a style issue.  And because of that, it's one of those
things that the Brand New 2008 Joe Pluta (limited edition, forward looking
statement, your mileage may vary, some restrictions apply) will avoid
debating one way or the other.

I'll tell you why I like Java's technique - because I like to be as close to
the bits and bytes as possible, and regardless of whether you should or
shouldn't be accessing member variables, I can tell just by looking whether
I'm getting the variable or calling a method that gets the variable.

Whereas I LIKE my 4GL to do everything (Ruby on Rails-ish), when I'm coding
a 3GL I prefer as little magic as possible.

But this is not a challenge, a slam, or a slight - it's just my opinion
<grin>.

Joe