Re: Buffering of DB output with *INLR=*OFF

[Adam Glauser <adamglauser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

joannegiblin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Why don't you just turn journaling on the file?  The journals will tell you
> what you want to know. 

Thanks for the suggestion.  It's mostly because I'm not really familiar 
with the ins and outs of journalling either.  Also, this isn't something 
that happens regularly, and it seems like I'd have to do a lot of work 
to dig out the relevant journal entries.  If journalling were already 
enabled for this file I'd have tried that route.

Is it really that easy to "just turn journaling on".  Given that there 
are potentially many updates to this file in a short period of time, it 
seems like keeping the information for all changes could present storage 
concerns.  Again, I'm not familiar with the details so please correct me 
if I'm wrong.