Re: Integers outperform Packed in a big way -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: Integers outperform Packed in a big way
From: James Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2008 11:56:34 -0800
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

DeLong, Eric wrote:

Regardless, there has never (to my knowledge) been a hardware BCD
processor in the i platform.... IBM optimized the system to prefer
dealing with packed, but it is a software implementation....

Remember, the original IMPI implementation of the AS/400 was on a CISC component CPU. It could (and presumably did) have hardware or firmware implementations of whatever the hell IBM Rochester wanted.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Integers outperform Packed in a big way , DeLong, Eric

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.