Socket vs. Dataq (was: RPG, Java and Classpath practices) -- RPG400-L

Subject: Socket vs. Dataq (was: RPG, Java and Classpath practices)
From: "Walden H. Leverich" <WaldenL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:44:38 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

David said:
(using sockets though, not data queues ...
given a chance to rework the implementation, I would probably use a

data

queue).

Why? Sure DTAQs are great. But it would seem to me that's it's an extra
artifact that you have to manage and deploy. Between's Scott's socket
stuff for RPG and the native Java stuff why not use sockets?

-Walden

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Socket vs. Dataq (was: RPG, Java and Classpath practices) , Aaron Bartell
Re: Socket vs. Dataq (was: RPG, Java and Classpath practices) , David Gibbs

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.