Re: Standards question: What is your feeling about %found & %eof vs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ? -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: Standards question: What is your feeling about %found & %eof vs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ?
From: Buck <kc2hiz@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2008 12:27:44 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Booth Martin wrote:

Standards question: What is your feeling about %found & %eof vs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ?

I always test %FOUND right after the CHAIN, not dozens or hundreds of lines away. I've never needed (or wanted) the qualified form.
--buck

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Standards question: What is your feeling about %found & %eof vs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ? , GUY_HENZA

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.