RE: Standards question: What is your feeling about %found &%eofvs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ? -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: Standards question: What is your feeling about %found &%eofvs. %found(file) & %eof(file) ?
From: rob@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2008 10:36:18 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<snip>
The program's logic may fail, but not the bif.
</snip>
and that's acceptable, why?

<snip>
is explicit and precise
</snip>
it may be precise, but may be precisely wrong. Again, back to the copy
and paste situation.

Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.