Re: Call stack inquiry performance - QWVRCSTK vs QMHSNDPM+QMHRCVPM -- RPG400-L

Subject: Re: Call stack inquiry performance - QWVRCSTK vs QMHSNDPM+QMHRCVPM
From: Scott Klement <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:29:09 -0500
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Why do you use *RQS type?? Seems like you could have strange results if you happen to have a request-handler running at that call-stack level. What was wrong with *DIAG?

Lim Hock-Chai wrote:

Ok. Use QMHSNDPM and specified the program name that I want to check on
the stack entry parameter works. I get CPF2479 when program is not in
the stack. (Note: Instead of *DIAG message type, I use *RQS message
type and do a QMHRCVPM to remove it.) Not sure if this method is faster
than QWVRCSTK or not. But it sound like it should.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.