RE: Re writing CL in RPG -- RPG400-L

Subject: RE: Re writing CL in RPG
From: David FOXWELL <David.FOXWELL@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:02:33 +0200
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the AS400 / iSeries <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

<winge>
You won't know for certain whether CPYF in arrival sequence, or CPYF in keyed sequence, or RPG is faster without performing a proper test.
My question is: If the CPYF method is fast enough why are you bothering about it?

MONMSG MSGID(CPF0864) EXEC(GOTO CMDLBL(END))

And fix this rubbish too. See the archives for the correct way to handle expected error messages in CL.

Regards,
Simon Coulter.

</winge>

And if you actually find the answer in the haystack er archives, post it for the rest of us!

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.