On 3-Oct-08, at 10:57 AM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

In either case, it is perfectly clear what the expression is doing. Sticking with fixed format, I'd write my second example this way:

But why on earth would you _want_ to stick with the old IFEQ type stuff? This thread has already demonstrated the inadequacies of the old style of coding. Using expressions doesn't require using /Free it can be coded in fixed form if someone is forced to stick with fixed.

e.g.

IF ( (A = B) or (C = D) )

Is perfectly valid in fixed form - so why not use it and avoid any possibility of ambiguity or misinterpretation?

Jon Paris

www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.