On 24/10/2008, at 12:01 AM, Charles Wilt wrote:
I thought the opposite was true. RPG's "scatter/gather" as you called
it, made RPG a poorer performer than COBOL.
What you are thinking of here is I/O performance. COBOL exposes the
raw data buffer whereas RPG (default behaviour) copies the data
buffer into separate fields. This gives COBOL an edge in I/O
intensive applications. However, as in all things related to
performance stuff changes on different releases and environments so
the only way to know for certain is to benchmark. Some people still
think a MOVE is faster than a Z-ADD.
Regards,
Simon Coulter.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
FlyByNight Software OS/400, i5/OS Technical Specialists
http://www.flybynight.com.au/
Phone: +61 2 6657 8251 Mobile: +61 0411 091 400 /"\
Fax: +61 2 6657 8251 \ /
X
ASCII Ribbon campaign against HTML E-Mail / \
--------------------------------------------------------------------
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.