VARYING is not at all related to by reference. So I don't think I understand this issue. Yes, when called from programs that don't know about varying, they would have to insert the 2-character length - so bite the bullet and pass the extra parameter - it's simple, albeit perhaps tedious.

Lim Hock-Chai wrote:
Thanks Adam, This particular *varsize field needs to be passed by
reference. Changing it to varying field would create unnecessary work
for caller.



"Adam Glauser" <adamglauser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:<mailman.1511.1225468208.13295.rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>...
Lim Hock-Chai wrote:
Can somebody suggest the best way to pass a *varsize parameter to a
*varsize parameter of another procedure with losing the original
length
of the variable?
If it is a character variable, consider using a VARYING character instead. That way the length is always available to whichever
procedure
needs it.

Note that this can cause a bit of pain for calling from languages that

don't fully support VARYING character as a type (CL for instance), but

it's not that hard to create utility procedure to build VARYING character strings from other string formats.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.