Re: CHAIN + DS as result field

[Adam Glauser <adamglauser@xxxxxxxxx>]

David FOXWELL wrote:
> I'm reading a subfile and passing the key values I've read to the subprocedure a bit like this :
>
> READC Mysubfile
> GetDbRecord ( SFzone1 : SFzone2 )
>
> GetDbRecord PI
> Filekey1
> Filekey2
>
> I 'think' if you do something like this :
>
> SETLL ( Filekey1 : Filekey2 ) MyFile;
> READ MyFile;
>
> You can modify SFzone1 and Sfzone2. Which wouldn't happen if I used the KDS.

Are sfZone1 and sfZone2 fields in the record format of myfile?