Re: Drop Case API

[CRPence <CRPbottle@xxxxxxxxx>]

Tom Liotta wrote:
> CRPence wrote:
>
> > FWiW: If isolation is expected, the setup does not include any
> > noted requirement for establishing logging [journaling] for the
> > TABLE which is required to enable isolation [commitment
> > control].
>
> Ummm... What? Is that in relation to the PTF or is it more
> general?
>
> That is, can you say that once more with different phrasing? I'm
>  probably reading this too late at night once again, but it feels
> like I'm missing something with that.

  Oddly I did not use the word /comments/, as in "comments as noted 
requirement", even though I thought to when originally replying.

  That was just the /reviewer/ in me over- /talking/ beyond what I 
originally meant to discuss.  I expect that in the setup & code 
there might be some assumptions /declared/.  As though comments are 
necessary even in every hack utility I might create.  I could not 
say for sure that Simon was source of that expectation in me, but I 
do recall he and another from way back, who made it obvious and thus 
/influencing/ me in understanding just how *nice* such spelled-out 
assumptions can be; even in, if not especially in, little snippets 
of code like that.

Regards, Chuck