Re: timestamp data type in DDS

[Tom Liotta <qsrvbas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

dale janus wrote:
> Hmmm, why not use CHGPF?
>
> Because old habits die hard?
>
> Because the first time I tried CHGPF I got a warning message that scared 
> me that I could lose data?

Does CPYF with (*MAP *DROP) not give a similar message? It should; I 
haven't actually looked. I'd expect mostly the same kinds of 'loss 
of data' to be possible both ways. Maybe the warning is a _good_ 
thing, eh?

Of course, CPFY with *NOCHK should be an obvious 'loss leader'. That 
should almost require additional programming to force the function 
to continue after acknowledging the condition.

Tom Liotta