RE: RPGV?

[john e <jacobus1968@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, maybe i encountered two, in my 20 yrs of RPG experience...

But i encountered many on this forum with (some) OO knowledge, or programming knowledge / interest in general.

This forum is in no way representative of RPG programmers.

I suppose that every knowledgable RPG programmer (i.e. is interested in programming in general) reads this forum.

The programming knowledge / interest of the average RPG programmer is embarrassing... 





> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 09:07:47 -0600
> From: vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: RPGV?
>
> John
>
> You have encountered one now - who has known of that stuff for years.
>
> ;-)
>
> john e wrote:
> > Namespaces / overloading has nothing to do with OO.
> > OO is all about encapsulation.
> > You don't encapsulate anything with namespaces/overloading.
> >
> > OORPG... please
> >
> > First try to make the current version of RPG a bit more sane...
> >
> > And why bother, i never encountered an RPG programmer who even heard about terms like "encapsulation" or even "variable scoping", let alone use it.
> -snip-
> -- 
> This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Het laatste nieuws, shownieuws en voetbalnieuws op MSN.nl
http://nl.msn.com/